On Saturday I got
into all six of the six panels I’d selected. I had once considered
adding a few more, but con and crowd fatigue took me back to my room
(with a little lunch on the way).
10:00 Older Women
in Genre Fiction with Catherine
Lundoff, Delia
Sherman, Liisa
Rantalaiho, and Helena
McCallum. One of the panelists defined “older” as age 40+.
All ages need role models, but too often older women are written as
cardboard, there to drive the plot. The young naive farmboy trope (a)
needs things explained to him, giving a place for infodumps and (b)
is energetic and vigorous. This is lazy; it’s harder to send an
older person adventuring. Some classic stereotypes are cures for
aging, having an older mentor die, and older women as either evil or
magical advisors who ease the main character’s path. Older women
used to tell the folklore
stories and validated the importance of wisdom; that doesn’t happen
anymore, so we need new folktales. Mystery novels are ahead of SFF,
with several older women as protagonists (such as Miss Marple, who
solves crimes basically by doing the stereotypical things that old
women do, such as watching and gossiping). SFF often is based on
action, which is almost always a young man’s game. If an older
woman goes adventuring, she is childless or her children are grown.
There were several recommendations
-
Terry Pratchett’s Granny Weatherwax, who doesn’t kick ass directly but gets people to kick their own ass.
-
Diane Wynne Jones has stories that show how hard it can be to get going in the morning.
-
Barbara Hambly’s stories about Starhawk, an older warrior.
-
Cordelia Naismith in Bujold’s Vorkosigan Saga as a supporting character (except for Shards of Honor and Barrayar, collected as Cordelia’s Honour, where she is the protagonist).
-
Elizabeth Moon’s Admiral Serrano.
-
Michelle Yeoh will be playing a starship captain in Star Trek Discovery.
11:00
Mental Illness in Science
Fiction and Fantasy with
Howard Tayler, Mary
Duffy, Emma Newman,
and Ash Charlton.
This was a very emotional
session, since several people were open about mental illnesses in
their own lives and those of close relatives. They
made the point that people need to become more aware of mental health
issues; one gave an example of a friend helping a family member
through a panic attack because they recognized it and knew what to
do. There is a need for representation of people with mental
illnesses just as with many other underrepresented groups, so people
can recognize themselves in the characters.
There
are a lot of examples of poor or harmful representation, such as
mental illness as a motivation for villains, or as a punishment, or
even as some kind of superpower. This starves us of stories of people
coping with mental illness. The villain trope lets people off the
hook – “I’m not mentally ill, so I can’t be bad.” PTSD has
become more commonly represented, but usually combat-related and
little from other forms of trauma (Jessica
Jones being
one of few counterexamples).
“Cure narratives” can be
problematic because some autistic people don’t want to undergo a radical
personality change. One needs support at home before coming out as
having a mental illness, and may need to block toxic people on social
media.
Some
recommended examples:
-
Dan Wells’ John Cleaver series, starting with I Am Not A Serial Killer, about a sociopath who fights monsters, plus The Hollow City.
-
HAL in 2001 could be seen as having gone mad from the contradiction in his programming, but some thought his/its response was deeply logical.
-
Sherlock in Elementary has some autistic characteristics, and at one point had an autistic girlfriend
12:00
Maintaining Your Scientist
Character's Credibility
with Evan Friedman,
Tommi Salminen,
Karen Lord, and
Kristine Hejna. A
scientist (or engineer) character has to remain credible for
immersion. You don’t need to prove you’ve done your research by
giving an infodump. You need absence of error in what the character
says and does, showing that the character is competent (not the
author). Some advice was “Don’t add a number you don’t need”
and “not every book needs footnotes and appendices.” You
can get away with deliberate twists in physics (such as FTL) but some
readers have less tolerance for mistakes in societal or economic
matters. For example, a doctor’s ethical principles are less likely
to change than the details of some illness or medical
technology. You need to get
expert beta readers.
Risk
management is consistently done poorly, with little regard for
failure modes or consequences of risks. Someone said we don’t want
people to manage risks because we want danger, but to me that runs
the risk of an idiot plot – unless it is management that is
idiotic, because there are famous real-world instances.
Some
examples:
-
Falling Free by Lois McMaster Bujold, with regard to risk management
14:00
Built Upon the Shoulders
of Giants with
Jon Oliver, Alex
Acks, Jeffrey A.
Carver, and George
R. R. Martin. This was in Hall 3, the largest venue; some of the
people in line were there for the topic, but a lot wanted to hear
GRRM.
Either
setting or story can come first; there
is No One Way for everyone. Hal
Clement meticulously worked out the details of his worlds before
writing stories, as did
Tolkien. You need to avoid infodumps, revealing only things the
reader will care about; you’ll know more than the readers and don’t
need to reveal all. You can give “infohints” instead of infodumps
– small reveals of distinctive details. You need to be internally
consistent, which Martin said was increasingly difficult in Westeros;
the fans have created wikis with more details than he can remember.
Another panelist keeps a spreadsheet with names and short
descriptions. Someone recommended Scrivener for managing details
while discovery writing.
Martin
was against creating rules for magic, magical systems. He wants magic
to be dangerous, supernatural, and unknowable. Another pointed out
that the “system” might be how people in the world think
magic works, but they could be wrong.
Martin
said that the Wall in Song of Ice and Fire
was inspired by Hadrian’s Wall. At the end someone said that Jane
Yolen rewrote a book because a character “told” her to, but
Connie Willis said “if a character tells me what to do, I kill
them.” Martin responded, “Kill a character? How horrible!”
18:00
On the Care and Feeding of
Secondary Characters with
Mur Lafferty, Carrie
Patel, Diana
ben-Aaron, Professor
Fiona Moore, and Teresa
Nielsen Hayden. There can
be ensemble casts with multiple “main characters” but generally
there is one MC who drives the plot. Secondary characters should
still have their own arcs, a reasonable amount of page time, their
own voice, and relationships with people other than the MC. They need
to be somewhat familiar to be relatable, but shouldn’t be stock /
stereotype. If beta readers ask too many questions about a secondary
character, you may have made them too interesting. A secondary
character can become the main character of a follow-on book, and much
fan fiction is about doing so (see An
Archive of Our Own).
Someone
asked if it was bad to make a character interesting then kill them
off; one response was that it’s not an issue because there is no
need to be kind. You can give them a good death scene, or make them
less likeable (perhaps by whining).
There
was one sidekick mentioned: Gonff in the Redwall
series, who is a funny, irreverent, sly contrast to Martin’s
seriousness.
20:00
It's Aliiiive! Bringing
Horror to Life in Fiction
with Mats
Strandberg, Anne
Leinonen, and J.R.
Johansson. Horror tries
to achieve visceral reactions and catharsis, The characters must be
relatable. One panelist said there should be a slow buildup; another
said that Game
of Thrones had a horrific
feel because no one is safe. A
key horror element is the normal becoming abnormal, the familiar
unfamiliar (which was also advice I got from Dan
Wells on the cruise). Are the characters aware of classic horror
tropes? One wondered what classic vampires think of Twilight.
Someone
asked what’s hardest to write. Various answers: Supernatural horror
can “go to 11” but they wouldn’t do that with a serial killer,
or sexual violence, or child trafficking and abuse.
No comments:
Post a Comment