On
the last weekend of July 2016
I was fortunate to be able to participate in a short story workshop
taught by Mary Robinette
Kowal over a Google Hangout, with seven other students. It was
advertised as "Intensive" and it sure was! But even though
it turned out to be a bit too intense for me (I wasn't able to
complete the Sunday exercises due
to brain weasels and other problems),
it was enormously valuable.
The format made a lot of sense. There were several sessions, separated by an amount of time almost sufficient to do the writing exercise (!) and critique two other peoples' just-handed-in exercise. Each hangout started with the critiques (from two students, plus Mary), followed by some lectures (with examples) from Mary to prep us for the next exercise. Something that made the weekend especially interesting was Mary's way of explaining writing techniques in terms of puppetry, her pre-writing career.
The thing foremost in my mind after all this time is the MICE quotient (Milieu, Inquiry, Character, Event), which is Mary's renaming of Orson Scott Card's original (where I=Idea), which the Writing Excuses podcasters have talked about before (and after I first posted this, published a new episode with an infographic), She found it was less confusing to her students after the rename. We had an exercise where we were to come up with two different arcs (IIRC of different types) and see what happens when you nest one within the other. Here was mine:
Idea 1 (character): Bili, a dwarven journeyman smith, is frustrated
that he is struggling with his masterwork and can’t produce the
quality he wants. He discovers his medium is silver, not iron, and
succeeds. (MC: Bili). This is a Character arc because it starts with
someone dissatisfied with himself, an internal conflict.
Idea 2 (event): Adirith, a young shapeshifting dragon, is enchanted
by a dragonmaster and sent to do stuff for reasons. She gets help to
break the enchantment and defeats the dragonmaster. (MC: Adirith).
This is an event arc because it starts with a disruptive external
event and results in a not-quite-clear final status quo (either
restoring her original free state, or perhaps improving it in some
way).
First I nested 1 inside 2:
<e>Adirith, a young shapeshifting dragon, is enchanted
by a dragonmaster and sent to collect ingredients for bad stuff, one
of which is a dwarf. <c>Bili, her closest friend, a
dwarf-smith, is trying to create his masterwork, and having trouble
making a bog-standard enchanted sword. Adirith tries to trick him
into accompanying her, but fails. He realizes she is enchanted, and
works a spell resistance into her silver scales, discovering that he
has an affinity for silver rather than iron.</c> Adirith
returns and slays the dragonmaster.</e>
Then I flipped to nest 2 inside 1:
<c>Bili, a dwarven journeyman smith, is frustrated by
being unable to produce a masterwork. <e>Adirith, his
shapeshifting dragon friend, is enchanted by a dragonmaster and sent
to capture him for reasons. They break the geas together via his
ability to enchant her silver scales.</e> Bili realizes
silver is his medium.</c>
I thought a problem with these is that both are phrased as multiple
points of view. I thought at the time I could see how to make the
first nesting entirely from Adirith’s point of view and the second
from Bili’s, but I no longer quite remember what I had in mind. I
got some useful feedback from Mary and two of the other participants.
I didn’t do anything with this exercise in the 12+ months since the
workshop; at the time I though novels were my thing and that short
stories were “too hard.” But on the Writing
Excuses 2017 cruise, we had a challenge to write a 250-word
micro-fiction and I managed to pull it off, so maybe I can write
short stories after all.
No comments:
Post a Comment